This Week in Health Reform—Federal Legislative Overview
Senate
Former President Bill Clinton visited Senate Democrats on Capitol Hill this week, urging them to quickly pass health care reform by the end of the year. Senate Leadership continues to work pulling its final merged bill together and Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) says that he will introduce the legislation on the Senate floor the week of November 16th.
Under Senate rules, a 60-vote majority is required to move the bill forward before official debate can begin. It is likely that Democrats will receive the 60-votes needed to move the bill to the Senate floor, but it remains to be seen whether Reid has the full 60 votes to overcome a filibuster for bill’s official passage. Reid is still aiming to pass the legislation by the Christmas holiday.
House
After passing its health care reform legislation, the “Affordable Health Care for America Act†(H.R. 3962), the House of Representatives was quiet this week.
Overview: Medicare Payroll in Senate Health Care Reform Legislation
The Senate’s health care reform legislation has still not yet been unveiled, but there are reports that an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office has found the bill to be more costly than expected, so Senate Democrats are already considering new ways to pay for the bill.
One of the options is an increase to the Medicare portion of the payroll tax on individuals making $250,000 per year or more. Currently, workers and employers each pay a 1.45 percent payroll tax for Medicare and the new proposal would increase that to 2.5 percent payroll tax bracket for those making $250,000 per year or more.
By including this new approach, it would allow the Senate to either reduce or eliminate altogether the controversial excise tax on “Cadillac†or high-cost insurance plans, passed in the Senate Finance Committee’s bill last month. Under legislation (S 1796) approved by the Senate Finance Committee, individual insurance plans costing more than $8,000 and family plans costing more than $21,000 would face a 40 percent excise tax on any amount above that level.
Watch the video related to health care reform bill
February 3, 2009 3:23 am 
By Tracy Turnblad, February 3, 2009 @ 4:18 am
First of all, Obama wants to make insurance more available to all and change the system so that it is cheaper. He also wants change so that the insurance companies find it harder to get out of paying for treatment. The system he is proposing looks similar to that which works in Holland and Switzerland where private companies are involved in providing insurance.
Second, of course universal health-cover sucks. That is why we in Western Europe have it. We think, hmm, our healthcare system sucks. I know, lets keep it. I guess that is the same with Japan and Canada as well.
Third, Obama campaigned on reforming the healthcare system. He said he wanted to make insurance more available and he was elected by the American people to do this.
FACT – the US has higher death rates for kids both for kids aged under one and those under five than western European countries with universal health coverage.
FACT – American insurance companies push up prices and work to stop paying out claims on those they cover.
FACT – the USA spends more on healthcare PER PERSON than any other nation on the planet.
That means that a dead American four year old would have had a better chance of life if they were born in Canada, France, Cuba, Germany, Japan etc, all of which have universal health coverage.
Last of all if you do not like the policies that Obama was elected to bring in, he can always be voted out of office in 2012.
By TomStar81, February 3, 2009 @ 4:51 am
Yes you are talking about TORT reform. the Democrats do not want to touch the Lawyers. it seems the Lawyers are in the democrats pocket.*
By Youtube Downloader, February 3, 2009 @ 4:06 am
véiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, que difuu
By URL Shortener, February 3, 2009 @ 5:01 am
dude, you own! this looks identical to a photograph
By skinnyblink7, February 3, 2009 @ 8:54 am
the new york times has an interactive feature which is actually very clear to understand. check it out.
By Anonymous, February 3, 2009 @ 7:30 am
HOLY CRAP! Comparing this to the original picture, they’re identical!
By Short, Fast, and Loud, February 4, 2009 @ 7:59 am
Obama does not have a bill. He has only given guidelines to what he wants. His last address made it more specific.
The bills in congress are not healthcare bills. They are health coverage bills. The government is trying to take control of a large portion of our economy. They are trying to make it so the government is a single payer source (I know i will get thumbs down for this, but follow hr3200 to its logical conclusion).
The current bills want to cover everybody in the US (Illegals too, there is nothing in these bills to prevent illegals from being covered. Amendments to ensure citizenship were tabled)
The federal government wants to punish you for not having insurance (they will get your money one way or another)
The government wants to regulate what care you will get. (When the system becomes overblaoted as any government system does, they will have 2 options increase taxes or ration care)
I know that there are a lot of people that will disagree with this. If they actually read the bills, and follow to there logical conclusions, in 10 years we will be a whole lot worse of than we are now. So doing nothing would actually be cheaper.
Reform must actually deal with the underlaying problems. HR 320o does not. Obama gave lip service to 1 of them.
By The Conservative Resistance, February 5, 2009 @ 1:05 pm
Under any Democrat President in history, the same M.O. emerges.
The Democrats "identify" a "crisis" and whip the people up into a frenzy about it. They proclaim themselves the carriers of the elixir that will heroically save all mankind from this "crisis.'' When Republicans seek to oppose the spending it will take for this elixir, they are automatically called hate mongers and obstructionists.
Clinton tried it with school lunch menus. He whipped that whole thing into some kind of "crisis." The Democrats wanted to raise the program by 10% and the Republicans wanted to raise it by 7%. That got reported in the media as a 3% CUT by Republicans. Only when a Democrat is President could an INCREASE be reported as a CUT. Just to make Republicans look bad, but too many people buy into the bullshit.
Al Gore, who wasn't even President, tried it with global warming and it didn't work. Today, it's health care. What'll it be tomorrow? The whole "world is ending in 2012" thing, or what?
By URL Shortener, February 6, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
awesome stuff man,….ama practice hard to get to yo level!